A Survey of the History of the Apocrypha from The Jewish Age to the Reformation
The subject of the
Old Testament canon has been a matter of debate between Protestants
and Roman Catholics for centuries. In the sixteenth century, the
Council of Trent officially accorded the Apocrypha canonical status,
decreeing these writings to be inspired Scripture. Roman apologists
assert that Trent merely affirmed what had been the universal
practice of the Church beginning with the North African Councils
of Hippo and Carthage in the late fourth century.
The information provided documents the history of the Old Testament canon and the Apocrypha from the Jewish age up to the time of the Reformation. The historical evidence conclusively demonstrates that the Jews did not accept the Apocrypha as part of the inspired corpus of the Old Testament, that many of the early Church fathers followed the Jewish canon and that the Church throughout the middle ages, including the period of the Reformation itself, followed the opinion of Jerome in denying the Apocrypha full canonical status. The writings were considered useful for the purposes of edification and for reading in the churches but were not authoritative for the establishment of doctrine.
Part 3 provides extensive documentation from the writings of some of the most renowned theologians of the Church from the sixth to the sixteenth centuries, much of which has been translated into English for the first time. The documentation gives convincing evidence that Trent's decree, rather than affirming the universal practice of the Church, was, in fact, contrary to it.
Part 1: The Canon of the Jews
Part 2: From the Church Age to Jerome
Part 3: From Jerome to the Reformation
Part 3: Endnotes